Play sex games onlines

19-Dec-2020 16:46

The first is called COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS (in Hubbard’s writings, criticism is not only unfounded, it is an attack).

Here are some pertinent sections where Hubbard lays out what he expects of the Intelligence Bureau (Ideal Scene), his direction on how to remove these enemies (Bright Idea) and his “laws” on the subject (Evolved Operating Principles) and then the steps to take (Plan).

Over and over we prove this.” And understand, this includes the wife who complains about her husband attending a Scientology group.

In the eyes of Hubbard (and thus all scientologists) she must have “had a baby he didn’t know about.” It could not be that she had a bad experience in or with scientology or scientologists. Anyone who criticizes scientology is trying to hide a criminal past and Scientology can uncover that.

Of course, the church refused to participate in or cooperate with the show, despite repeated requests by Leah, the production company and A&E.

play sex games onlines-3play sex games onlines-31

I have had the pleasure of working with Leah on this show as a consultant and participant, a cause of great distress for the church.

The answer is simple: their responses are dictated by unalterable “scripture” that MUST be followed. This way there is one place for anyone who is dealing with scientology to get briefed — whether an individual, the media or a government agency.

And this will serve a primer on the subject for time immemorial as scientology cannot change what L. Scientology has its own nomenclature for those who speak publicly about it without being authorized by the church.

But more importantly, scientology does not WANT it to be canceled.

In their minds Hubbard was right about everything he said, if it seems unsavory, so be it. These (and many other references) are now the policies of the Office of Special Affairs that direct their actions to be taken against “critics.” Perhaps the most significant Hubbard writings on this subject are two policies from 28 March 1972.

I have had the pleasure of working with Leah on this show as a consultant and participant, a cause of great distress for the church.

The answer is simple: their responses are dictated by unalterable “scripture” that MUST be followed. This way there is one place for anyone who is dealing with scientology to get briefed — whether an individual, the media or a government agency.

And this will serve a primer on the subject for time immemorial as scientology cannot change what L. Scientology has its own nomenclature for those who speak publicly about it without being authorized by the church.

But more importantly, scientology does not WANT it to be canceled.

In their minds Hubbard was right about everything he said, if it seems unsavory, so be it. These (and many other references) are now the policies of the Office of Special Affairs that direct their actions to be taken against “critics.” Perhaps the most significant Hubbard writings on this subject are two policies from 28 March 1972.

Forget the “over and over we prove this” absurdity — no such proof exists. Ron Hubbard said it, you can ask Thus, the table has been laid. And for those who have never been in scientology, it is important to know that one must ALWAYS make everything L. Thus, if some poor staff member was tasked with dealing with a mother upset about her daughter’s involvement in scientology, they would be EXPECTED to find her crimes. Perhaps now sending out PI’s to interview other family members or co-workers. And if they cannot find them, they are admonished to manufacture them (as stated in another reference covered below) or just allege them (keep reading this one). Even in the best light, this is an allegorical but unmistakable entreaty to forcefully bring about the demise of those who dare operate with a “media-type of attitude toward Scientology.” The phrase “hit by a Mack truck” is fairly common usage meaning to be dumbfounded.